1 Chronicles 5:3

Authorized King James Version

PDF

The sons, I say, of Reuben the firstborn of Israel were, Hanoch, and Pallu, Hezron, and Carmi.

Original Language Analysis

בְּנֵ֥י The sons H1121
בְּנֵ֥י The sons
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 1 of 8
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
רְאוּבֵ֖ן I say of Reuben H7205
רְאוּבֵ֖ן I say of Reuben
Strong's: H7205
Word #: 2 of 8
reuben, a son of jacob
בְּכ֣וֹר the firstborn H1060
בְּכ֣וֹר the firstborn
Strong's: H1060
Word #: 3 of 8
first-born; hence, chief
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל of Israel H3478
יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל of Israel
Strong's: H3478
Word #: 4 of 8
he will rule as god; jisral, a symbolical name of jacob; also (typically) of his posterity
חֲנ֥וֹךְ were Hanoch H2585
חֲנ֥וֹךְ were Hanoch
Strong's: H2585
Word #: 5 of 8
chanok, an antediluvian patriach
וּפַלּ֖וּא and Pallu H6396
וּפַלּ֖וּא and Pallu
Strong's: H6396
Word #: 6 of 8
pallu, an israelite
חֶצְר֥וֹן Hezron H2696
חֶצְר֥וֹן Hezron
Strong's: H2696
Word #: 7 of 8
chetsron, the name of a place in palestine; also of two israelites
וְכַרְמִֽי׃ and Carmi H3756
וְכַרְמִֽי׃ and Carmi
Strong's: H3756
Word #: 8 of 8
karmi, the name of three israelites

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Trans-Jordanian tribes and their failures section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term מַעַל (ma'al) - unfaithfulness/treachery is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting Consequences of covenant unfaithfulness.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Trans-Jordanian tribes: Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection